willing to be led into new ventures and to explore new ideas it was with
little trepidation I accepted the news that my surgically extracted neck
lymph node proved that my body had been invaded by what orthodox medicine
considers an advanced, ‘incurable’ form of blood cancer known
as follicular lymphoma.
as far as I am concerned this is not a problem and nor is it incurable.
Not that I’m happy about it! This is an opportunity and one that is
greeted with open-minded thinking and an attention to detail. While for
the most part the reaction to my atypical response to this news has been
so incredibly supportive that it has reduced me to tears, a small number
of people have tried to encourage me to act normal, do what the doctors
say, “just take the chemo” and stop considering other options.
But that would be really, really stupid. And here’s why.
starters I am not being offered chemo so would have to find a rouge doctor
or street dealer somewhere who could get me some. And, most important of
all, chemotherapy does not cure cancer. It treats cancer and is at best
a short-term fix. This is a devastatingly critical detail which many people
overlook in the cloud of fear generated by a cancer diagnosis. One could
treat cancer, or more to the point a sign of cancer, as is a tumour, with
paint stripper or melted chocolate and would probably achieve a similar
long-term success rate to chemotherapy. Doing nothing is often a better
choice! Really. Chemo does indeed buy some cancer patients some time and
is seen to be helpful in a handful of cancers, particularly some rarer ones,
but is generally the opposite of helpful when it comes to curing most cancers.
This is why obscene sums are still being raised in an apparent search for
a cancer cure. Chemo drugs also kill off healthy cells and actually feed
the rather cunning cancer cells, which they typically fail to fully eradicate,
so ultimately kill the patient sooner or later. Or ‘complications’
do. Complications caused by a devastated immune system caused by what? Chemo!
Radiation is the other key treatment for cancer patients but that doesn’t
cure cancer either. Radiation! This is not rocket science. It’s not
really science. It’s not always popular to say any of this but the
popular view on most things is pretty distorted and anyway that’s
the true beauty of information. We don’t have to believe anything
anyone says all we have to do is allow them to say it. It is also well documented
that radiation and chemotherapy actually cause cancer and have killed a
great many people, not least by bringing on secondary cancers when given
to people with devastated immune systems.
choosing those options is a personal matter and it’s certainly no
consideration for me not least because I have been fortunate to land a type
of cancer that progresses slowly and responds especially quickly to chemotherapy
and a consultant who has been honest enough to admit this. I am instead
advised to “watch and wait” for my condition to deteriorate
to the point where I may gain a year or two of decling health once dosed
up with the last-hope chemo hit. Not much of a solution from decades of
investment in the science of torturing billions of animals and watching
needy people die. I have far greater ambitions for my life than to wait
for it to come to a premature and grizzly end and I have done my own research
so have all the knowledge I need to know there is actually a solution to
this which gives me complete control of the cancer and a sophisticated way
of getting rid of it altogether. A cure. Few people are prepared to even
consider this and the cancer industry loathe anyone using such a word, but
the truth is that in just 30 years one man named Gerson working alone with
his instincts and with his patients and against immense opposition made
more progress in understanding and curing cancer than the vast swath of
pharmaceutical research has come close to. I hear it repeated robotically
that this cannot be true or those mystical scientists would have told us
about it, but there’s a lot that science isn’t telling us. Not
everyone is going to succeed with this therapy or be happy to do the work
involved, but it is what it is.
Gerson observed “Cancer is easy to cure.
The problem is that it’s in people”
at the long years spent confined in various institutions, schools, prisons,
I look at how many years we lounge in front of TV’s being programmed
or slaving for someone else, just to survive, all of which when added together
doesn’t come close to equalling the outcome of spending a couple of
years rebuilding a body and the lifetime of potential that effort will bring.
acceptance of this cancer diagnosis is aided by my refusal to have my thinking
corralled and from an understanding that things are never quite what they
seem. Seek and you will find! If we fail to seek the truth we are destined
to live in fear, a state that makes us exploitable, a state that the mainstream
media and the controlled structure it maintains will always seek to perpetuate.
The new religion of Science plays a key role in corralling our thinking.
Be Thy Medicine, Let Medicine be Thy Food.
simple philosophy as espoused by Hippocrates, the man they call the father
of modern medicine and to whom doctors swear their oath. It is the magic
code, the miracle cure that will save humanity and the animals and the natural
world, in my view. The role of nutrition has been so neglected by orthodox
medicine that those doctors understand less about its place in sustaining
and recovering health than their patients, yet were they not so controlled
by the drug pushers doctors could dramatically reverse the sickness trend
befalling humanity. But of course the reason they do not is because there
is no money in it for the Big Pharma conglomerate by sharing with its potential
customers - all of us - the knowledge that we can cure ourselves at home
without their products. Obviously their wealth comes from sick people not
healthy ones. Another devastatingly critical detail!
one denies the notion that ruthless people will go to such extremes to exploit
others, one might dare to at least consider it a possibility that there
may be an incontrollable urge in the cold hearts of some to simply ignore
information which would cause them to lose billions in profit if it were
widely shared. During my research I pondered over the lengthy list of popular
celebrities who were well connected, were not short of money and whose cancers
were treated conventionally yet are longer with us. Either orthodox medicine
told them there was no cure for cancer or just failed to mention that there
may well be. Instead they were offered a generous supply of drug treatment.
If the idea this is deliberate is too negative to consider, one could instead
think more positively and look at what one particular method of curing cancerous
disease has achieved for those who have diligently followed its instructions,
and wonder if this doesn’t make bloody good sense even if the drug
suppliers want to pretend otherwise and have you stick with them.
assessed each of these notions and have come to the same conclusion. Hence
my decision to incorporate the thouroughly logical principles of the Gerson
Therapy. I’m fond of organic farming, work with nature and have been
promoting the ideas of Max Gerson over those of the drug and chemical companies,
so it was a simple step for me when confronted with cancer to set about
working with rather than against my body in order to heal it. My orthodox
cancer consultant agrees that my thing will only go in one direction and
will eventually consume me and can only suggest we wait for that to happen.
One of my Gerson doctors not only cured her own recurrent cancer many years
ago using the Gerson method, after chemo failed her, but also works with
many others who have used Gerson to heal themselves. Both doctors are really
good company but one has been trained in both realms and has extensive experience
in curing cancer, the other doesn’t. For me this is a no brainer.
Gerson Therapy focuses specifically on organic nutrition and detoxification
using organic coffee enemas in order that the body will heal itself. It
is a lengthy process but it works better than anything else we know of in
ridding the body of virtually all degenerative diseases, even far advanced
cancer. On the down side it takes time and juicing 20lbs of fruit and veg
a day in itself takes a great deal of self-discipline on the part of the
patients and dedication from carers. The patient has to make dramatic lifestyle
changes if they wish to stay alive. The overall cost of two years treatment
works out less and is vastly more cost effective than the conventional process.
However, it is of course born by the patient and not by the £400million
annual earnings of Cancer Research UK, the taxpayer or state health insurance.
This is no quick fix pop a pill and get on with your life type thing and
won’t suit everyone, but it’s idiotic to claim it doesn’t
found when sharing novel ideas and new ways of thinking about things that
people are generally more fearful of that light than the dark. Many of us
are still doubtful of questioning the conventional ‘wisdom’
lest we be ridiculed while others are not even aware there is anything to
question. Watching so many gentle people die in ignorance of cancer solutions
makes me uncomfortable so I share this journey in the hope of bringing a
positive slant and for anyone who might be grateful they at least had a
choice. I am very privileged to have been exposed to the work of Max Gerson
and the Gerson Therapy and I am also deeply moved by the depth of understanding,
love and support we are getting from a vast swath of people, friends, strangers
and family alike. The veil of ignorance is indeed lifting.
reality is it often takes many years to do the damage to our bodies so we
have to be prepared to work on the repairs if that is our goal. On the positive
side, Gerson heals. Something that Big Pharma is not best known for. Their
focus is on pill production, profits and symptom relief. Gerson also cures
without resorting to crude animal experiments, thus providing a solution
to that viciously cruel and costly habit. And curiously it also satisfies
those who are supporters of animal experiments and insist on vivisection
opponents offering themselves for testing if animals are to be spared. Well,
here I am! And I’m not alone.
to all these dramatic benefits, the environment and the bees and other insects
will be spared the grotesque chemical fertilisers and pesticides currently
poisoning the ground in huge quantities when growing our food. And of course
the crops will be healthier and so will the consumers who will be better
able to afford organic fruit and vegetables (or fruit and vegetables as
our grandparents knew them) as they are mass-produced and the costs come
down. And not to mention the fantastic sums that will be saved searching
for that ever elusive cancer cure that is apparently always just around
the corner. How ironic that the organic farmers and suppliers are just around
the corner! In fact they will deliver to your door.
what of the employment potential? Remove the sheep and replace them with
healing food crops. Perhaps the researchers can instead help work on the
land and grow the medicine?
were to invest more in studying the Gerson method rather than swamping cancer
researchers with ever more funds to juggle around and mix up drugs in that
never ending search for the right combination that adds an extra few months
to mice we might make some progress and reverse the death count. It sounds
simple but the best solutions often are and there is too much at stake to
ignore the possibility.
brilliant Dr, Max Gerson, proved in clinical research on himself and many
willing others that this approach is the solution to the widespread problem
of dis-eased biological entities, whatever the disease may be called. And
who will argue this approach can’t be modified with some serious investment
instead of ridicule and dismissal and a continual repetitive reliance on
the norm. It was Einstein who postured that the definition of insanity is
repeating the same actions over and over while expecting different results.
for proof of concepts. I have trawled the Internet and read many books seeking
answers to this one. I could quote all day long and not just the natural
healers and truth seekers but try this for starters. A comprehensive 2004
study of the effect of chemotherapy on the 5-year survival, which is the
conventional, scientific benchmark, found a massive failure rate in excess
of 97%. No, there is no decimal point missing and this not a number I have
made up. The surgical removal of tumours can extend this survival period
but it can equally see cancer cells distributed by the scalpel and either
way the problem still remains since the body is diseased and the tumour
is merely a symptom. I fully support anyone choosing this path but for those
wanting to know more...
from the British Medical Journal…
treatment of the most common adult tumours by cytotoxic chemotherapy is
popular notion that five year survival can be equated with cure is clearly
of limited value because of its inability to take into account the great
variations in the clinical course of the different tumours. For example,
carcinomas of the breast and prostate are notorious for late recurrence,
occasionally well over five years after definitive local treatment. Earlier
diagnosis and treatment of cancer as a consequence of mass screening and
new technology, changing diagnostic criteria and changes in the way cancers
are recorded and registered are important variables that have a net positive
influence on survival statistics. Although dramatic advances have occurred
in the treatment and survival of patients with fairly rare cancers, several
eminent workers now believe that the much publicised recent gains in five
year survival (and “cure”) are more apparent than real.”
chooses to ignore the possibility that laetrile or bicarbonate of soda have
a role in tumour removal, which is less toxic, there is still a place for
chemotherapy drugs in the control of a small number of the more rapidly
growing cancers that the slower Gerson method doesn’t have time to
reverse. However that application of dangerous toxic material must still
then be removed with the Gerson method (or similar) or they will kill as
surely as the cancer. Most doctors wont tell you this since they are actually
given more training in how to play with words than they are taught about
nutrition. That said I have found that if you ask the questions directly
you will either be mocked or get something close to the truth. Either way
you’ll be closer to the answer you need regarding their treatment
than if you remain silent.
in the pathological findings in my case. My extracted lymph revealed in
the centre a very curious black substance, which really shouldn’t
be there and provides a hint at my body breakdown. I will cover this is
greater detail shortly. It is very interesting!
maybe also explore why some vegans have lost direction when seeking to promote
a healthy lifestyle while consuming lab created food-like products that
mimic so called normal meals, which we now know must be excluded totally
if one wants to enable the body to recover from disease. No need to deprive
ourselves totally of all these taste and texture sensations if we are healthy
but some sell veganism as an answer to cancer and that is misleading. Cruelty
yes, cancer no. According to the findings of The
China Study animal protein and dairy in particular is an absolute no
no if one wants to avoid feeding cancer cells, but some of the crap vegans
eat in processed, non organic food-like products are absolutely not recommended
information on the Gerson Therapy and my experience of it is shared in the
hope of evolving our thinking about food and nutrition and for anyone who
needs to know this for their own healing and for those who want to join
me on this journey. There are other genuine cures available but Gerson makes
so much sense and addresses critical issues such as not growing our food
in toxic, chemical laden soil. I am truly grateful for the advice people
are offering regarding other cancer treatments and offers to help with various
aspects and the love felt is, as I say, quite overwhelming. Advice I always
welcome instructions I do not. I am no alone in responding negatively to
being told ‘you need to’ do this or that. Before giving out
instructions to me please ask yourself how many cancers you have cured with
your advice. For me to pay attention you will need to have a damn good answer!
It is absolutely essential we research and share and inform and advise each
other but please don’t dictate or instruct.
also encouraging that the overwhelming bulk of the feedback coming in refers
to non-orthodox options. We have clearly begun to think these things through.
Let me be clear though, I have made my decision on the path I am following
and will not be adding anything into the mix unless it is agreed by my medical
team. Gerson is a finely tuned, scientific protocol based on decades of
study, which works best if followed to the letter. The best advice is to
not mix and match and if it ain’t broken don’t try and fix it.
no doubt this is my journey even though I’m not cured yet and have
obstacles to overcome so I am not getting ahead of myself. I will not cajole
anyone, though I do strongly recommend we all avail ourselves of all the
facts before believing anything or embarking on something so sensible as
a nutrition and detoxification therapy such as that which I am using to
cure my incurable cancer in line with the work of the brilliant Max Gerson
and all those who have followed in his footsteps and healed their bodies
of degenerative diseases such as cancer.