“Jade's cancer has spread” : the medics and the media
announced : it had not.
cancer – breast, colon, ovarian, lung – all cancer is a systemic,
constitutional disease, present in the body long before the appearance of
any recognisable cancer cells. Tumour metastasis is not the spreading of
cancer to previously healthy tissue. Only in a case of genuine cancer, where
the whole body is already cancerous, is metastasis possible. The notion
that cancer could be caught early and successfully treated by surgery, drugs
and radiation is lethal disinformation.
"It is utter nonsense to claim that catching cancer symptoms early
enough will increase the patient's chances of survival … If one has
cancer and opts to do nothing at all, he will live longer and feel better
than if he undergoes radiation, chemotherapy or surgery ; other than when
used in immediate life-threatening situation. ... .. With every cancer patient
who keeps in excellent physical shape .., there’s a high chance that
the body will find its own defence against the cancer. He may have many
good years left in good health. He shouldn’t squander them by being
made into a hopeless invalid through radical medical intervention which
has zero chance of extending his life.” Prof. H.B. Jones, Dept. of
Physics/Physiology Univ. of Ca .
"Patients who presented early and were treated in less than 30 days
had significantly worse outcomes... the drive for all women with possible
breast cancer to be seen within 14 days ...is not supported by this study."
Sainsbury, Johnston, Haward. Lancet 1999 353 p1132.
the 1920s, Dr Otto Warburg carried out a great deal of work on cancer’s
basic mechanism and was awarded a Nobel Prize in 1932. Warburg’s work
clearly demonstrated that cancer is, fundamentally, a relatively simple
disease where cell oxygen falls to a level sufficiently low enough for the
cell to change in nature. Warburg defined cancer as a condition where the
respiration of oxygen in the normal cell is replaced by the fermentation
of glucose. Today, as planetary oxygen levels fall and pollution increasingly
drives oxygen from the cell, cancer rates continually increase. Cancer and
viruses need anaerobic – airless - conditions : this has given rise
to the dangerous myth that viruses cause cancer : whereas a virus is, merely,
sometimes found at a tumour site. There is no evidence of a causal link
between any virus and any form of cancer.
1966, after his efforts had been ignored by the cancer industry for over
thirty years, Warburg addressed a group of fellow Nobel Laureates, reiterating
his views and concluded .. “ .. nobody today can say that one does
not know what cancer and its prime cause be. On the contrary, there is no
disease whose prime cause is better known., … how long prevention
will be avoided depends on how long the prophets of agnosticism will succeed
in inhibiting the application of scientific knowledge in the cancer field.
In the meantime, millions … must die of cancer unnecessarily.”
was in 1966, referring to research that was considered scientifically sound
enough to achieve a Nobel Prize in the early 1930s : knowledge that has
now been available for over 70 years. Dr Warburg’s work has never
been refuted : just, understandably, avoided by one of the world's largest
As the cause has been known so has the correct treatment. Enlightened practitioners
have long successfully treated cancer victims using direct oxygen therapy
and/or a regime of raw, organic, vegan, alkalising, oxygenating nutrition.
day-one, Jade should have been started on a wholistic regime : treatment
designed to raise the level of health – physical, mental, emotional,
spiritual – to as high a degree as possible so that the the body's
health status becomes superior to the disease : the only way to successfully
treat a cancer victim.
2004, The Nutritional Cancer Therapy Trust had been in operation for 6 years
and had treated 500 patients : 90% of them “terminal”: people
who had been left for dead by the orthodoxy and many, who, after NCTT therapy,
were years past their “die-by” dates. As such, it was a sure
target for the cancer business and their very good pals at the BBC. Watchdog
was chosen as the vehicle : the programme makers decided not to ask direct
questions of the Trust director but opted for secret filming in order to
edit and discredit.
- “The treatment costs ?8,000 per year.” FALSE : the net cost,
above normal living expense was ?4,500, equal to the State aid available.
Conventional treatments costed, at that time, ?20/30,000 yearly.
of you … want some serious questions asked about the NCTT.”
: implying that there was public concern being expressed about the NCTT
methods. FABRICATION ; this was a made to order hatchet-job.
.. cancer cells. Forty years ago, they would have, most likely, killed.
Today, the odds of survival are much better. That’s, largely, down
to how early cancer is spotted and how it is treated with chemotherapy and
radiotherapy and a range of drugs.” COMPLETE INVENTION.
programme used two patients. The first was a woman, Lavinia. “.. she
was told she had a 75% chance of survival.” : LIES : she had advanced,
widespread cancer, and had life-expectancy, at most, of weeks. Instead of
turning her away, as hopeless, she was accommodated and survived for over
two months. Watchdog used her alleged husband to portray the idea that he
had been reluctantly supporting her efforts, although not believing in the
treatment. FALSE : he was not her husband : they had been accrimoniously
divorced and he had, at her insistence, had no contact with her during her
final days and was not aware of the details of her experience.
The other patient was not a NCTT client : and did not use the NCTT regime.
is a drug successfully used in the treatment of breast cancer”. FALSE
: no woman has ever been restored to health through this drug.
this vegetable juice ..is making them weaker .. people are .. telling us
again and again.” PEOPLE WERE NOT. Watchdog stated that they had evidence
that coffee enemas were dangerous : THERE WAS, AND IS, NO EVIDENCE. The
presenter, Nicky Campbell announced, in the presence of the Trust's medical
director, a highly qualified, experienced PhD chemist, that the treatment
was “snake oil”.
of this gutter-snipery was being paid for by the captive licence-payers,
who complained in sufficient numbers to force the BBC to abandon, briefly,
its policy of treating complaints as mere amusement. Another programme,
where some reality was allowed, was made and broadcast. The War on Cancer,
using the human body as a passive battlefield, invariably trashed in the
process, has resulted in countless millions of premature, totally unnecessary
deaths. Surgery has its place where the threat to life processes is immediate
; an obstructed, oesophagus, colon etc... Radiation which seeks to remove
the tumour by burning instead of cutting, is of the same curative value
as surgery : ie. zero : but it also has many destructive, carcinogenic,
immuno-suppressive effects. Cyto-toxic drugs - “chemotherapy”
are designed to kill cells. Even the most intellectually-challenged of the
medical orthodoxy should know that class-6 super-poisons, substances with
which the administering nurses have to handle using industrial gloves, should
have no place in the human body. When the lunacy was at its peak, childrens'
kidneys were being destroyed within days. Parents whining that the treatment
had killed their off-spring, forced a toning down so that the destructive
process increased to weeks, then months. This was, of course, “great
progress in childhood cancer treatment”. Professor Karol Sikora, arguably,
the cancer orthodoxy’s top man, stated, on Channel 4 TV.
Being honest about the pros and cons of cancer treatment isn't always easy
for doctors ; I think that all patients undergoing chemotherapy believe
they're going to be cured by it and, in six months time, they'll be able
to walk out free of cancer. That's the dishonesty of the business. We, as
doctors, tend not to confront people with the reality.... Chemotherapy is
a failure, with some short term benefits at enormous cost ... Conventional
medicine cannot cure cancer.” Also on C4, in a programme about 3 women
who had opted for chemotherapy and had died, one oncologist declared “I
can't understand why women take chemotherapy and suffer so terribly for
THERE IS NO CORRELATION BETWEEN TUMOUR CUTTING/BURNING/POISONING/REMOVAL
AND PATIENT SURVIVAL. “Conventional medicine cannot cure cancer.”
anyone tell Jade ?
The Topic of Cancer – when the killing (by treatment PR) has to stop,
Dr B A Richards states “Medical malpractice is defined as ' ..improper
or injurious medical or surgical treatment through carelessness, ignorance
or intent...' further, '..a more serious criminal lack of care arising from
deliberate disregard for the care and safety of other persons constitutes
manslaughter.' Could it not be criminal and, thus, manslaughter if the patient
so treated dies of his treatment rather than his disease?” Where are
the central feature of the cancer ritual, is produced by the petrochemical
industry, who also supply the deluge of agricultural, medical, industrial
... synthetics, driving the cancer plague. The petro-boys are inextricably
linked with the cancer business and with the contract vivisection companies
who test the poisons on rats, beagles, flying foxes ... : whatever is required
to produce the required “safe” result. All, of which, is keenly
supported by the government and its enforcement agencies. Many decades ago,
the cancer industrialists realised that a dense smokescreen was necessary
to mask the fact that their treatments were considerably worse than useless.
The misdiagnosis ploy was born.
“ Beginning in 1940, through redefinition of terms, various questionable
grades of malignancy were classed as cancer. After that date, the proportion
of 'cancer' cures having 'normal' life expectancy increased rapidly, corresponding
to the fraction of questionable diagnoses included.” Prof. Jones.
the breast cancer enterprise leads the way. App. 42,000 UK breast cancer
diagnoses are made, yearly : around 13,000 actually have breast cancer ;
some 13,000 women, with breast cancer, die, annually. It could be a coincidence
or it could be that for the woman with genuine cancer who opts for the medical
package, diagnosis equals death, Divine Intervention excepted The periodic
parading, in the press or on television, of some - preferably famous –
woman, whose imaginary breast cancer has been "cured", encourages
ever more lemmings to rush forward for the physical/radioactive assault
of mammography. It also convinces the real cancer victim to go down the
same treatment route : with the inevitable fatal result.
they started trading as "Cancer Research UK" the Imperial Cancer
Research Fund and the Cancer Research Campaign had around 170 years of fund-raising
between them.When they started, cancer was a rare disease : now it has long
been out-of-control : 40% - and rising - of the UK population have, or will
develop cancer. CRUK are collecting over ?400,000,000 each year : none of
which will be spent on research into safe, effective cancer treatments.
CRUK will not fund any research which is a threat to The Cancer Business.
SOLUTION TO CANCER WOULD MEAN THE TERMINATION OF RESEARCH PROGRAMMES, THE
OBSOLESCENCE OF SKILLS, THE END OF DREAMS OF PERSONAL GLORY. TRIUMPH OVER
CANCER WOULD DRY UP CONTRIBUTIONS TO SELF-PERPETUATING CHARITIES...IT WOULD
MORTALLY THREATEN THE PRESENT CLINICAL ESTABLISHMENT BY RENDERING OBSOLETE
THE EXPENSIVE SURGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL AND CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS IN
WHICH SO MUCH MONEY, TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT IS INVESTED...” and, as
for suggestions of a different approach, “ THE NEW THERAPY MUST BE
DISBELIEVED, DENIED, DISCOURAGED AND DISALLOWED AT ALL COSTS, REGARDLESS
OF ACTUAL TESTING RESULTS AND, PREFERABLY, WITHOUT ANY TESTING AT ALL."
The Houston/Null Analysis.
the ICRF , issued a statement - "One of the biggest myths in recent
years is that there is a cancer epidemic caused by exposure to radiation,
pollution, pesticides and food additives." The fact that no genuine
cancer research organisation would go out of its way to protect the industries
mainly responsible for the incidence of cancer is completely lost on the
CRUK-tee-shirted celebrity and media supporters, the "Race for Life"
disciples and the other simple, trusting souls, running marathons or shaking
tubs in the street. Laughably-transparent, pharma-plants, trying to pass
themselves off as “medical editors”, “health correspondents”
... supply regular, mythical “breakthroughs” and “increased
was no greater or lesser than any other person, but she joins a long list
of people in the public eye, who opted for the orthodox onslaught : King
George V1, The Shah of Persia, Senator Hubert Humphrey, John Wayne, Diana
Dors, Jackie Onassis, Bobby Moore, Roy Castle, Marti Caine, Dusty Springfield,
Linda McCartney, King Hussein of Jordan, George Harrison, John Thaw, Alan
Bates, Bob Monkhouse, Anne Bancroft, Wendy Richard .... : all R.I.P. Whilst
the 27-year-old was being destroyed by a regime diametrically-opposed to
that which she needed for survival, the various friends, agents, observers,
media hacks ... busied them selves with anything but asking “why”.
One of God's Representatives on Earth – female, Catholic variety -
stated that Jade's new husband should not have his legal curfew lifted to
be with Jade on their wedding night.
pals, well-meaning, but misinformed and duped, called for cervical screening
at an earlier age ; implying that Jade's death was due to being “caught
too late” and that early treatment saves lives : both wrong. The HPV-vaccine
pushers were paraded ; ignoring the fact that the multi-million dollar/pound
vaccine stunts were causing deaths and huge amounts of side-effects and
that there is not a scrap of any cause-effect evidence linking the HP Virus
with cervical cancer. The giggly-jigglies with their pink bunny costumes,
will soon be doing the “Race for Life” “for Jade”
: raising more millions for those who funded the “research”
which developed the drugs that Jade was given. One American doctor observed
that to do the same thing over and over and over again and expect a different
result is a form of insanity ; but not all of the oncologists are certifiable
: some know exactly what they are doing. Their attitude seems to be “The
punters have seen what happened to their relatives and friends : if they
are stupid enough to accept the same treatments, they deserve all they get.”
However, this argument has several flaws. Some of the victims are children
who have no knowledge or control : as for the consenting adults, is an intelligence-based
cull acceptable? Are we not all idiots of varying degrees : where is the
line drawn? Then there is the colossal financial cost ...
has not been touched by this disease in some way? The Jade legacy should
be, primarily, that those with some - any - interest in cancer and in a
position of whatever influence, large or small, should analyse the views
of the cancer heretics and either reject - with of course, reasons - or
The message, for the trembling subjects of The Great God of Modern Medicine,
is :- It is time to exhibit independent thought and courage : it only hurts
to begin with.
Rattigan N.D. March 2009 NEMESIS PO Box 73 Chesterfield S41 0YZ 01246 230474