The Killing of Jade Goody

2/4/09

“Jade's cancer has spread” : the medics and the media announced : it had not.

Cervical cancer – breast, colon, ovarian, lung – all cancer is a systemic, constitutional disease, present in the body long before the appearance of any recognisable cancer cells. Tumour metastasis is not the spreading of cancer to previously healthy tissue. Only in a case of genuine cancer, where the whole body is already cancerous, is metastasis possible. The notion that cancer could be caught early and successfully treated by surgery, drugs and radiation is lethal disinformation.
"It is utter nonsense to claim that catching cancer symptoms early enough will increase the patient's chances of survival … If one has cancer and opts to do nothing at all, he will live longer and feel better than if he undergoes radiation, chemotherapy or surgery ; other than when used in immediate life-threatening situation. ... .. With every cancer patient who keeps in excellent physical shape .., there’s a high chance that the body will find its own defence against the cancer. He may have many good years left in good health. He shouldn’t squander them by being made into a hopeless invalid through radical medical intervention which has zero chance of extending his life.” Prof. H.B. Jones, Dept. of Physics/Physiology Univ. of Ca .
"Patients who presented early and were treated in less than 30 days had significantly worse outcomes... the drive for all women with possible breast cancer to be seen within 14 days ...is not supported by this study." Sainsbury, Johnston, Haward. Lancet 1999 353 p1132.

In the 1920s, Dr Otto Warburg carried out a great deal of work on cancer’s basic mechanism and was awarded a Nobel Prize in 1932. Warburg’s work clearly demonstrated that cancer is, fundamentally, a relatively simple disease where cell oxygen falls to a level sufficiently low enough for the cell to change in nature. Warburg defined cancer as a condition where the respiration of oxygen in the normal cell is replaced by the fermentation of glucose. Today, as planetary oxygen levels fall and pollution increasingly drives oxygen from the cell, cancer rates continually increase. Cancer and viruses need anaerobic – airless - conditions : this has given rise to the dangerous myth that viruses cause cancer : whereas a virus is, merely, sometimes found at a tumour site. There is no evidence of a causal link between any virus and any form of cancer.

In 1966, after his efforts had been ignored by the cancer industry for over thirty years, Warburg addressed a group of fellow Nobel Laureates, reiterating his views and concluded .. “ .. nobody today can say that one does not know what cancer and its prime cause be. On the contrary, there is no disease whose prime cause is better known., … how long prevention will be avoided depends on how long the prophets of agnosticism will succeed in inhibiting the application of scientific knowledge in the cancer field. In the meantime, millions … must die of cancer unnecessarily.”

This was in 1966, referring to research that was considered scientifically sound enough to achieve a Nobel Prize in the early 1930s : knowledge that has now been available for over 70 years. Dr Warburg’s work has never been refuted : just, understandably, avoided by one of the world's largest industries.
As the cause has been known so has the correct treatment. Enlightened practitioners have long successfully treated cancer victims using direct oxygen therapy and/or a regime of raw, organic, vegan, alkalising, oxygenating nutrition.

From day-one, Jade should have been started on a wholistic regime : treatment designed to raise the level of health – physical, mental, emotional, spiritual – to as high a degree as possible so that the the body's health status becomes superior to the disease : the only way to successfully treat a cancer victim.

In 2004, The Nutritional Cancer Therapy Trust had been in operation for 6 years and had treated 500 patients : 90% of them “terminal”: people who had been left for dead by the orthodoxy and many, who, after NCTT therapy, were years past their “die-by” dates. As such, it was a sure target for the cancer business and their very good pals at the BBC. Watchdog was chosen as the vehicle : the programme makers decided not to ask direct questions of the Trust director but opted for secret filming in order to edit and discredit.

Watchdog - “The treatment costs ?8,000 per year.” FALSE : the net cost, above normal living expense was ?4,500, equal to the State aid available. Conventional treatments costed, at that time, ?20/30,000 yearly.

“Some of you … want some serious questions asked about the NCTT.” : implying that there was public concern being expressed about the NCTT methods. FABRICATION ; this was a made to order hatchet-job.

“ .. cancer cells. Forty years ago, they would have, most likely, killed. Today, the odds of survival are much better. That’s, largely, down to how early cancer is spotted and how it is treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy and a range of drugs.” COMPLETE INVENTION.

The programme used two patients. The first was a woman, Lavinia. “.. she was told she had a 75% chance of survival.” : LIES : she had advanced, widespread cancer, and had life-expectancy, at most, of weeks. Instead of turning her away, as hopeless, she was accommodated and survived for over two months. Watchdog used her alleged husband to portray the idea that he had been reluctantly supporting her efforts, although not believing in the treatment. FALSE : he was not her husband : they had been accrimoniously divorced and he had, at her insistence, had no contact with her during her final days and was not aware of the details of her experience.
The other patient was not a NCTT client : and did not use the NCTT regime.

“Tamoxifen is a drug successfully used in the treatment of breast cancer”. FALSE : no woman has ever been restored to health through this drug.

“All this vegetable juice ..is making them weaker .. people are .. telling us again and again.” PEOPLE WERE NOT. Watchdog stated that they had evidence that coffee enemas were dangerous : THERE WAS, AND IS, NO EVIDENCE. The presenter, Nicky Campbell announced, in the presence of the Trust's medical director, a highly qualified, experienced PhD chemist, that the treatment was “snake oil”.

All of this gutter-snipery was being paid for by the captive licence-payers, who complained in sufficient numbers to force the BBC to abandon, briefly, its policy of treating complaints as mere amusement. Another programme, where some reality was allowed, was made and broadcast. The War on Cancer, using the human body as a passive battlefield, invariably trashed in the process, has resulted in countless millions of premature, totally unnecessary deaths. Surgery has its place where the threat to life processes is immediate ; an obstructed, oesophagus, colon etc... Radiation which seeks to remove the tumour by burning instead of cutting, is of the same curative value as surgery : ie. zero : but it also has many destructive, carcinogenic, immuno-suppressive effects. Cyto-toxic drugs - “chemotherapy” are designed to kill cells. Even the most intellectually-challenged of the medical orthodoxy should know that class-6 super-poisons, substances with which the administering nurses have to handle using industrial gloves, should have no place in the human body. When the lunacy was at its peak, childrens' kidneys were being destroyed within days. Parents whining that the treatment had killed their off-spring, forced a toning down so that the destructive process increased to weeks, then months. This was, of course, “great progress in childhood cancer treatment”. Professor Karol Sikora, arguably, the cancer orthodoxy’s top man, stated, on Channel 4 TV.

“ Being honest about the pros and cons of cancer treatment isn't always easy for doctors ; I think that all patients undergoing chemotherapy believe they're going to be cured by it and, in six months time, they'll be able to walk out free of cancer. That's the dishonesty of the business. We, as doctors, tend not to confront people with the reality.... Chemotherapy is a failure, with some short term benefits at enormous cost ... Conventional medicine cannot cure cancer.” Also on C4, in a programme about 3 women who had opted for chemotherapy and had died, one oncologist declared “I can't understand why women take chemotherapy and suffer so terribly for no purpose.”
THERE IS NO CORRELATION BETWEEN TUMOUR CUTTING/BURNING/POISONING/REMOVAL AND PATIENT SURVIVAL. “Conventional medicine cannot cure cancer.”

Did anyone tell Jade ?

In The Topic of Cancer – when the killing (by treatment PR) has to stop, Dr B A Richards states “Medical malpractice is defined as ' ..improper or injurious medical or surgical treatment through carelessness, ignorance or intent...' further, '..a more serious criminal lack of care arising from deliberate disregard for the care and safety of other persons constitutes manslaughter.' Could it not be criminal and, thus, manslaughter if the patient so treated dies of his treatment rather than his disease?” Where are the lawyers?

Chemotherapy, the central feature of the cancer ritual, is produced by the petrochemical industry, who also supply the deluge of agricultural, medical, industrial ... synthetics, driving the cancer plague. The petro-boys are inextricably linked with the cancer business and with the contract vivisection companies who test the poisons on rats, beagles, flying foxes ... : whatever is required to produce the required “safe” result. All, of which, is keenly supported by the government and its enforcement agencies. Many decades ago, the cancer industrialists realised that a dense smokescreen was necessary to mask the fact that their treatments were considerably worse than useless. The misdiagnosis ploy was born.
“ Beginning in 1940, through redefinition of terms, various questionable grades of malignancy were classed as cancer. After that date, the proportion of 'cancer' cures having 'normal' life expectancy increased rapidly, corresponding to the fraction of questionable diagnoses included.” Prof. Jones.

Today, the breast cancer enterprise leads the way. App. 42,000 UK breast cancer diagnoses are made, yearly : around 13,000 actually have breast cancer ; some 13,000 women, with breast cancer, die, annually. It could be a coincidence or it could be that for the woman with genuine cancer who opts for the medical package, diagnosis equals death, Divine Intervention excepted The periodic parading, in the press or on television, of some - preferably famous – woman, whose imaginary breast cancer has been "cured", encourages ever more lemmings to rush forward for the physical/radioactive assault of mammography. It also convinces the real cancer victim to go down the same treatment route : with the inevitable fatal result.

Before they started trading as "Cancer Research UK" the Imperial Cancer Research Fund and the Cancer Research Campaign had around 170 years of fund-raising between them.When they started, cancer was a rare disease : now it has long been out-of-control : 40% - and rising - of the UK population have, or will develop cancer. CRUK are collecting over ?400,000,000 each year : none of which will be spent on research into safe, effective cancer treatments.
CRUK will not fund any research which is a threat to The Cancer Business.

"A SOLUTION TO CANCER WOULD MEAN THE TERMINATION OF RESEARCH PROGRAMMES, THE OBSOLESCENCE OF SKILLS, THE END OF DREAMS OF PERSONAL GLORY. TRIUMPH OVER CANCER WOULD DRY UP CONTRIBUTIONS TO SELF-PERPETUATING CHARITIES...IT WOULD MORTALLY THREATEN THE PRESENT CLINICAL ESTABLISHMENT BY RENDERING OBSOLETE THE EXPENSIVE SURGICAL, RADIOLOGICAL AND CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS IN WHICH SO MUCH MONEY, TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT IS INVESTED...” and, as for suggestions of a different approach, “ THE NEW THERAPY MUST BE DISBELIEVED, DENIED, DISCOURAGED AND DISALLOWED AT ALL COSTS, REGARDLESS OF ACTUAL TESTING RESULTS AND, PREFERABLY, WITHOUT ANY TESTING AT ALL." The Houston/Null Analysis.

CRUK-component, the ICRF , issued a statement - "One of the biggest myths in recent years is that there is a cancer epidemic caused by exposure to radiation, pollution, pesticides and food additives." The fact that no genuine cancer research organisation would go out of its way to protect the industries mainly responsible for the incidence of cancer is completely lost on the CRUK-tee-shirted celebrity and media supporters, the "Race for Life" disciples and the other simple, trusting souls, running marathons or shaking tubs in the street. Laughably-transparent, pharma-plants, trying to pass themselves off as “medical editors”, “health correspondents” ... supply regular, mythical “breakthroughs” and “increased survival rates”

Jade was no greater or lesser than any other person, but she joins a long list of people in the public eye, who opted for the orthodox onslaught : King George V1, The Shah of Persia, Senator Hubert Humphrey, John Wayne, Diana Dors, Jackie Onassis, Bobby Moore, Roy Castle, Marti Caine, Dusty Springfield, Linda McCartney, King Hussein of Jordan, George Harrison, John Thaw, Alan Bates, Bob Monkhouse, Anne Bancroft, Wendy Richard .... : all R.I.P. Whilst the 27-year-old was being destroyed by a regime diametrically-opposed to that which she needed for survival, the various friends, agents, observers, media hacks ... busied them selves with anything but asking “why”. One of God's Representatives on Earth – female, Catholic variety - stated that Jade's new husband should not have his legal curfew lifted to be with Jade on their wedding night.

Her pals, well-meaning, but misinformed and duped, called for cervical screening at an earlier age ; implying that Jade's death was due to being “caught too late” and that early treatment saves lives : both wrong. The HPV-vaccine pushers were paraded ; ignoring the fact that the multi-million dollar/pound vaccine stunts were causing deaths and huge amounts of side-effects and that there is not a scrap of any cause-effect evidence linking the HP Virus with cervical cancer. The giggly-jigglies with their pink bunny costumes, will soon be doing the “Race for Life” “for Jade” : raising more millions for those who funded the “research” which developed the drugs that Jade was given. One American doctor observed that to do the same thing over and over and over again and expect a different result is a form of insanity ; but not all of the oncologists are certifiable : some know exactly what they are doing. Their attitude seems to be “The punters have seen what happened to their relatives and friends : if they are stupid enough to accept the same treatments, they deserve all they get.” However, this argument has several flaws. Some of the victims are children who have no knowledge or control : as for the consenting adults, is an intelligence-based cull acceptable? Are we not all idiots of varying degrees : where is the line drawn? Then there is the colossal financial cost ...

Who has not been touched by this disease in some way? The Jade legacy should be, primarily, that those with some - any - interest in cancer and in a position of whatever influence, large or small, should analyse the views of the cancer heretics and either reject - with of course, reasons - or accept them.

The message, for the trembling subjects of The Great God of Modern Medicine, is :- It is time to exhibit independent thought and courage : it only hurts to begin with.

Patrick Rattigan N.D. March 2009 NEMESIS PO Box 73 Chesterfield S41 0YZ 01246 230474 hera@nemesisawake.com

 

From Dusk 'til Dawn
An Insider's View of the Growth of the Animal Liberation Movement

© Keith Mann
puppypincher@yahoo.co.uk