Questions That Stump Every Pro-Vaccine Advocate and Their Claims
the flu pandemic was declared, there have been several so-called "vaccine
experts" coming out of the wood work attempting to justify the effectiveness
of vaccines. All of them parrot the same ridiculous historical and pseudoscientific
perspectives of vaccinations which are easily squelched with the following
The study of vaccines, their historical record of achievements, effectiveness,
safety and mechanism in humans are well understood and proven in scientific
and medical circles.
The claim is completely false.
to ask: Could you please provide one double-blind, placebo-controlled study
that can prove the safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence on ANY study which
can confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence which can prove that
disease reduction in any part of the world, at any point in history was
attributable to inoculation of populations?
to ask: Could you please explain how the safety and mechanism of vaccines
in the human body are scientifically proven if their pharmacokinetics (the
study of bodily absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of ingredients)
are never examined or analyzed in any vaccine study?
the most critical elements which defines the toxicity potential of any vaccine
are its pharmacokinetic properties. Drug companies and health agencies refuse
to consider the study, analysis or evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties
of any vaccine. There
is not one double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the history of vaccine
development that has ever proven their safety, effectiveness or achievements
(unless those achievements have underlined their damage to human health).
are also no controlled studies completed in any country which have objectively
proven thatvaccines have had any direct or consequential effect on the reduction
of any type of disease in any part of the world. Every single study that
has ever attempted to validate the safety and effectiveness of vaccines
has conclusively established carcinogenic, mutagenic, neurotoxic or fertility
impairments, but they won't address those.
Preservatives and chemical additives used in the manufacture of vaccines
are safe and no studies have been linked or proven them unsafe for use in
The claim is completely false.
to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification as to how injecting
a human being with a confirmed neurotoxin is beneficial to human health
and prevents disease?
to ask: Can you provide a risk/benefit profile on how the benefits of injecting
a known neurotoxin exceeds its risks to human health for the intended goal
of preventing disease?
issue is no longer even open to debate. It is a scientifically established
fact in literally hundreds of studies that the preservatives and chemical
additives in vaccines damage cells. Neurotoxicity, immune suppression, immune-mediated
chronic inflammation and carcinogenic proliferation are just a few of several
effects that have been observed on the human body. See
a list of chemicals in vaccines
the drug companies still tell us the damage vaccines have on the human body.
People just don't read them. All you have to do is look at the insert for
any vaccine, and it will detail the exact ingredients,
alerts and potentially lethal effects.
my latest analysis of the Arepanrix H1N1 vaccine for an example.
professional who believes that it is justified to inject any type of neurotoxin
into any person to prevent any disease is completely misguided, misinformed,
deluded and ignorant of any logic regarding human health.
Once an individual is injected with the foreign antigen in the vaccine,
that individual becomes immune to future infections.
The claim is completely false.
to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification on how bypassing
the respiratory tract (or mucous membrane) is advantageous and how directly
injecting viruses into the bloodstream enhances immune functioning and prevents
to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification on how a vaccine
would prevent viruses from mutating?
to ask: Could you please provide scientific justification as to how a vaccination
can target a virus in an infected individual who does not have the exact
viral configuration or strain the vaccine was developed for? All promoters
of vaccination fail to realize that the respiratory tract of humans (actually
all mammals) contains antibodies which initiates natural immune responses
within the respiratory tract mucosa. Bypassing this mucosal aspect of the
immune system by directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream leads to
a corruption in the immune system itself. As a result, the pathogenic viruses
or bacteria cannot be eliminated by the immune system and remain in the
body, where they will further grow and/or mutate as the individual is exposed
to ever more antigens and toxins in the environment which continue to assault
the immune system. Despite the injection of any type of vaccine, viruses
continue circulating through the body, mutating and transforming into other
organisms. The ability of a vaccine manufacturer to target the exact viral
strain without knowing its mutagenic properties is equivalent to shooting
a gun at a fixed target that has already been moved from its location. You
would be shooting at what was, not what is!
may mutate, change or adapt several times over a period of one flu season,
making the seasonal influenza vaccine 100% redundant and ineffective every
single flu season. Ironically, the natural immune defenses of the human
body can target these changes but the vaccines cannot.
never encountered one pro-vaccine advocate, whether medically or scientifically
qualified, who could answer even 1 let alone all 9 of these questions. One
or all of the following will happen when debating any of the above questions:
will concede defeat and admit they are stumped
will attempt to discredit unrelated issues that do not pertain to the question.
will formulate their response and rebuttal based on historical arguments
and scientific studies which have been disproved over and over again.
pro-vaccine advocate will ever directly address these questions in an open
Exposed: Think Twice!
Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research,
cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.
full list of h1n1 vaccine ingredients, alerts and warnings.
· More articles in the Flu