shame – animal groups react to the latest EU statistics for the number
of animals used in experiments The European Coalition to End Animal Experiments
(ECEAE), a coalition of key animal protection groups across the EU, has
today expressed its profound disappointment at the lack of a significant
decrease in the number of animals used in experiments across the European
Union. This follows the publication of the Sixth Statistical Report
(1) by the European Commission which covers data collected by 27 Member
States for the year, 2008 (2).
statistics, the first publicly available since 2005, have been released
only weeks after the EU adopted new legislation on animal experimentation
(replacing the earlier Directive 86/609/EEC) (3). This new legislation has
been criticised by the ECEAE as being a missed opportunity to introduce
measures that would have given greater protection to animals used in experiments.
latest statistics show:
Total number of animals used in 2008 was just above 12 million which is
a small decrease from 2005 (reported as 12.1 million)
user countries continues to be France, UK and Germany, constituting approximately
55% of the total number of animals used throughout the EU. Germany use increased
by 11% (to 2,021,782), UK by 21% (to 2,266,884) and France by 0.13% to (2,328,380).
increases in the number of animals used in certain countries, including
Spain (increase of 51% to 897,859), Estonia (increase of 610% to 34,794),
Ireland (increase of 197% to 112,835), Austria (increase of 32% to 220,456)
and Portugal (increase of 22% to 50,888).
for certain species include: over 21,000 dogs (a decrease of 12%), over
330,000 rabbits (an increase of 7%) over 9,500,000 rodents (includes 11%
increase in mice), over 4,000 cats (an increase of 5%), over 92,000 pigs
(an increase of 40%) and over 9,000 nonhuman primates (including a decrease
of 8% in new and world old primates but an increase of 86% in Prosimians).
56% of old world primates are still imported from non-EU countries and include
wild-caught animals and their offspring.
use of animals includes an increase in the use of animals for fundamental
biological research of 13% to 4,575,054 animals, an increase of 13% to 478,511
in the use of animals for the production and quality control of products
and devices for veterinary medicine. There was also a sharp increase in
the use of animals for food additives from 34,225 to 54,164 and 319,117
animals were poisoned to death in studies like the Lethal Dose 50, which
included 354 dogs. ECEAE Chief Executive, Michelle Thew states: “The
ECEAE is extremely disappointed by the lack of a significant drop in the
number of animals used in experiments across the EU. Despite the opportunity
to improve the lot of animals in laboratories, the recently adopted legislation
does not include any mechanism to systematically reduce and ultimately replace
the use of animals in research. The future looks bleak for the millions
of animals who will continue to suffer and die each year in EU laboratories.
Tragically we do not believe the situation will improve during the next
five years. This is Europe’s shame.”
and images of animals in UK and EU laboratories are available. For these
or further information, contact Fleur Dawes at email@example.com or +44(0)
7850 510 955 (out of hours) or +44 (0) 207 619 6978. ECEAE Web Site: http://www.eceae.org/
(1) For the European Commission statistical reports, please
follow this link:
(2) The Report gives an overview for the year 2008
with the exception of one Member State (France) who reported data of 2007.
(3) The EU legislation on the use of animals in experiments
requires the 27 EU Member States to provide the European Commission with
statistical information on the use of animals in experiments. On the basis
on this information, the European Commission publishes a report on the use
of animals in the EU. Although Directive 86/609/EEC was revised in September
2010, the common format used for the collection of data is based on the
requirements of the old Directive 86/609 (until the
revised Directive is in force).
(4) Figures submitted by member states are not always consistent
with their own national figures due to differences in the types of animal
covered in national legislation. For example, the UK national figures are
approximately one third higher than the figures they submit to the EU because
they include genetically modified animals.