very reputation of so-called "science" has been irreparably damaged
by the invocation of the term "science" by GMO lackeys, pesticide
pushers, mercury advocates and fluoride poisoners who all claim to have
science on their side. It seems that every toxin, contamination and chemical
disaster that now infects our planet has been evangelized in the name of
"science" used to be highly regarded in the 1950's, today the
term is largely exploited by pharmaceutical companies, biotech giants and
chemical companies to push their own for-profit agendas. Actual science
has little to do with the schemes now being pushed under the veil of science.
matters even worse for the sciences, many so-called "science bloggers"
have been revealed to have financial ties to the very same companies whose
profits are shored up by their activities http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/08/the-new-york-times-exposes-scienceblogs.html
than defending any sort of scientific truth, science bloggers have become
the internet whores of Big Pharma, Monsanto, pesticide manufacturers, chemical
companies and toxic mercury factories. There's hardly a dangerous chemical
in widespread use today that the science bloggers haven't venomously defended
as safe and effective. Many are just blatantly paid off by corporate entities
to run around the internet pushing GMOs, chemicals and vaccines.
realization has caused the science bloggers to be widely ridiculed by intelligent
people who see right through their thinly-veiled (but well-funded) disinformation
campaigns. Where science bloggers once had credibility, they now are seen
as intellectual prostitutes for dangerous corporate agendas that benefit
powerful companies at the expense of environmental health and human health.
weren't doing all this in the name of science, it wouldn't be so bad, actually.
If they called themselves "corporate whore bloggers" instead of
"science bloggers," their actions wouldn't be so harmful to the
reputation of science itself. But, to the great detriment of actual science,
they insist on calling themselves "science bloggers."
the reputation of "science" itself is suffering
the for-profit GMO sellouts, poison pushers, vaccine zealots and corporate
front groups continue to conduct their activities under the false name of
"science," the term is losing its meaning. This should be cause
for alarm among those who practice legitimate science. (Where are the astrobiologists
when you need them?)
seen all too frequently, "science" can be easily distorted or
exploited to achieve a desired political or profiteering goal. But the ruse
is rather apparent -- the public is awakening to the science fraud and learning
that the term "science" doesn't really mean what it used to. It's
suffering a loss of reputation to such a degree that the term "science"
no longer means a system whereby intellectually honest people search for
the underlying truths of how nature operates. Today, "science"
is used not to search for truth, but to distort the truth.
"science" with "fraud" to understand the spin
of seeking knowledge and understanding, for example, "science"
is used as an intellectual bludgeon to halt rational skepticism and discussion
on topics such as GMOs, vaccines, mercury fillings, fluoride in the water,
the mysterious deaths of animals, the collapse of honeybee populations and
so on. It's a kind of intellectual tyranny that has been invoked against
those who oppose any kind of corporate agenda that can be dressed up to
look like actual science.
contexts, the term "science" has become synonymous with "fraud."
As in the following headlines (replace "science" with "fraud"
as you read them):
has now been revealed that the researchers who made up the fictitious study
results were engaged in SCIENCE."
asked how he came up with the fabricated clinical trial data upon which
the FDA approved the drug, discredited researcher Humphrey Brokendata explained
he was only engaged in SCIENCE."
the vast majority of the popular news reports you might read about so-called
"scientific" findings make a whole lot more sense if you replace
the word "science" with "fraud." For example, imagine
the words being exchanged in these headlines:
GMOs backed by solid SCIENCE
FDA insists its drug approvals are based on SCIENCE
Monsanto claims the SCIENCE behind its seed technology is better than ever
Vaccines stand their ground this flu season thanks to SCIENCE
see how suddenly everything makes more sense on these particular topics
when you replace "science" with "fraud?"
isn't a stretch, either. The "scientific" agenda behind GMOs,
for example, has absolutely nothing to do with real science. It is a corporate
for-profit agenda that seeks control over the world's food supply while
forcing farmers to buy seeds year after year from one centralized corporate
entity. That's not science. It's just a monopolistic crime against humanity
to assault the basic rights of people to be able to grow their own foods
and harvest their own seeds without worrying about those seeds being contaminated
with genetic pollution from genetically engineered crops.
real science on GMOs indicates that reasonable people have every right to
be concerned about the DNA pollution of the foods that feed our world. But
through the blasphemous invocation of the term "unscientific,"
the GMO pushers attempt to characterize rational, reasonable people who
hold concerns about GMOs as "unscientific." As if they didn't
believe in the Law of Gravity or Newtonian physics for macro-sized objects.
scientific community loses credibility by the day
endless assault on common sense by those who use the term "science"
as a cover for dangerous global experiments in plant and human biology will
only further discredit the scientific community. When you see "scientific"
doctors and dentists putting their reputations behind things like water
fluoridation -- which is the blatant mass pollution of the water supply
with a toxic hazardous waste chemical -- it's no surprise why the street
cred of so-called "scientific thinkers" continues to erode.
is all very sad to see, of course. I consider myself a proponent of scientific
thinking, and I strongly value the Scientific Method as one approach to
gaining knowledge. I'm educated in microbiology, genetics, physics and have
acquired a considerable amount of scientific knowledge in many other areas.
I'm currently studying M-theory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-theory
and the intersection of quantum physics with consciousness. (There's a taboo
topic in conventional scientific circles for ya -- don't talk about consciousness,
for God's sake! To quote Einstein, God may not play dice with the universe...
but consciousness does!)
proponent of scientific discovery, even I have to admit that science has
lost its credibility due in large part to the corporate takeover of science.
Whereas science was once a popular and highly respected field of study for
young thinkers, very few people in America enter the sciences these days.
More and more people are waking up to the reality that many of the great
evils that have been unleashed upon our world have been conducted in the
name of science: GMOs, seasonal flu vaccines, plastic food containers, pesticides,
mercury poisoning, fluoride in the water supply, psychiatric pharmaceuticals
and so on.
it turns out, hasn't saved us: It has quite possibly doomed us. The destruction
that has already been unleashed upon our world in the name of science may
not be reversible in the era of humankind. We may be setting ourselves up
for a global food supply catastrophe due to GMOs and pesticides, for example,
and literally billions of human beings may ultimately die from it. "Science"
was the invocation behind GMOs and pesticides, even though in truth the
whole scheme was pulled off through what can only be called "junk science"
or "selected science."
science is a valid tool when used with integrity
it saddens me to see science misappropriated in this way, because true science
is a valid and valuable method by which human beings can seek to gain understanding
about the universe in which we live. It is not the only pathway to knowledge,
of course (a frequent mistaken assumption by those who are steeped in it),
but it is a valuable one nonetheless. Yet thanks to today's corporate-led
"scientific" schemes involving GMOs, vaccines, pesticides and
other chemicals, the value of science itself is being rapidly lost to the
intellectual tyranny demonstrated by those who destroy our world in the
name of science.
real scientists once used to welcome debate and discussion, today's "science"
advocate operate with the intellectual finesse and flexibility of a two-ton
block of granite. You either agree with them or you are branded an idiot.
There is no discussion, no debate, no thought and no real science involved.
On so many of the big issues that matter today -- vaccines, GMOs, mercury,
fluoride, pesticides and so on -- the "science" position is that
of a self-proclaimed dictator (or tyrant) who believes he causes things
to be true and factual through the mere act of stating them. That isn't
science. It's just an advanced form of arrogant bullying framed in the language
of science and carried aloft by a never-ending stream of corporate dollars.
in essence, intellectual tyranny.
may yet destroy us
was Oppenheimer who, after playing a key role in the invention of the atomic
bomb, quoted these words from the ancient Hindu text known as the Bhagavad
Gita: "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
a very large segment of the scientific community is engaged in much the
same behavior: Destroying our world through the incessant and utterly unscientific
advocacy of dangerous, destructive interventions that threaten our food,
our waterways and the very future of life on Earth.
"science," it seems, may ultimately be the destroyer of life as
we know it on our planet. And yet "science" is worshipped by its
followers as the savior of life on Earth. There is a dangerous disconnect
in that situation. Perhaps one of Biblical proportion.
that one day a future alien civilization will study the history of humankind
and attempt to determine how we destroyed ourselves. After sorting through
the decomposed rubbish of the long-extinct human civilization, one alien
will turn to the other alien and nod its head to say, "It seems their
civilization was based on SCIENCE FRAUD."
For the record, I am not opposed to actual science, nor the use of the Scientific
Method as one avenue through which wisdom may be gained. There are other
methods of gaining wisdom, however, such as spirituality, meditation, the
study of consciousness and even quantum connections between sentient beings.
All of these non-science methods are utterly disregarded by the "scientific"
community which believes so strongly in its own dogma that the brains of
its top scientists have no room left for any ideas other than their own.
That is, by the way, the very definition of a closed mind. It also happens
to be the reason why conventional science only advances at the speed at
which its dogmatic intellectual tyrants retire or perish.
of my favorite books that have influenced my deeper understanding of real
of the Multiverse: Parallel Worlds, Hidden Dimensions, and the Ultimate
Quest for the Frontiers of Reality by John Gribbon
of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn
Enigma: Physics Encounters Consciousness by Bruce Rosenblum and Fred Kuttner
Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena by Dean Radin
Adams, the Health Ranger